Daily Camera News

More Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS Lens Rumors

More details are coming for Canon’s previously rumored 24-70mm f/2.8L lens with built-in image stabilization technology.

According to latest Canon rumors, the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS lens is allegedly in development but the official announcement is expected to be in 18-24 months period. It’s a long wait because the size is too big with image stabilization feature, so Canon released a smaller EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II instead.

The IS version of the standart zoom lens would not replace the non-stabilized version, and would probably cost a lot. The IS being worked on for the lens will provide better performance than anything currently in the Canon lineup, along with more optical upgrades.

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS Lens Rumored for Late 2016

canon-ef-24-70mm-f2-8l-is-lens-rumored-to-be-in-development

Canon’s EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM lens is the most popular lens in the lineup and it will sure compete the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 VR lens. Meanwhile, the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM standart zoom lens is currently priced for $2,299.00 at Amazon.

The price of this new IS lens will be more expensive than EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM, and will not replace EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM.

via CanonRumors

Some links on this page may be affiliate links. Learn more.
Topics: Canon, Lenses Tags: , , ,

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Sign-up for the latest news, rumors, comparisons and updates.

Avatar for Daily Camera Editor Team

Author: Daily Camera Editor Team

“Daily Camera News Team brings you the latest photography gear news, rumors, and reviews, keeping photographers updated with expert insights and hands-on advice.”
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
© 2026 Daily Camera News.
All content and images are © Daily Camera News.
Daisy™ is an original AI character developed for Daily Camera News.
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x