Daily Camera News

More Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 Mark III Lens Rumors

More details have been leaked online for the next L lens from Canon which could be named as EF 16-35mm f/2.8 Mark III lens.

According to latest Canon rumors, the next “L” lens from Canon will be a fast wide-angle zoom lens with a bright aperture of f/2.8. There are two candidates for this lens which might be the long rumored EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III lens or EF 15-35mm f/2.8L lens.

The replacement for the EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM wide-angle zoom lens is said to be in development and the announcement could be in the next several months, mostly when EF 35mm f/1.4L II USM lens stock levels are good.

More Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 Mark III Lens Rumors

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM

The new Canon f/2.8 wide-angle zoom lens is in the works and that it would be a very good alternative to the recently launched EF 11-24mm f/4L USM lens. The rumored fast wide angle zoom lens also required which is expected to be lighter, cheaper and easier to use than the EF 11-24 f/4L too.

Event and indoor photographers would be very happy with wider focal length version, but the question is the price of this lens. Currently Canon’s first ultra-wide L-series EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM lens which feature image stabilisation is priced for $1,199.

via: Canon Rumors

Topics: Canon Tags: , , , ,
Avatar for Daily Camera Editor Team

Author: Daily Camera Editor Team

“Daily Camera News Team brings you the latest photography gear news, rumors, and reviews, keeping photographers updated with expert insights and hands-on advice.”
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
© 2025 Daily Camera News.
Daily Camera News is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x